Sustainability Framework 2006– What we can do, within the existing economic systemNo-one made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do so little Edmund Burke The climate scientists agree that we have a short time to attempt to avert climate catastrophe – about five to 10 years to start to implement changes. The recommendation is that we need to cut CO 2 emissions by at least 80% before 2050: currently those emissions are still rising on 1990 levels. |
Level One – Conservation and Reduction of Energy Consumption |
We should Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Recycle : a guiding principle in all our consumption behaviour http://www.earthlysins.org/http://www.cat.org.uk/information/information.tmpl Such as :
|
Level Two – Lobbying, Getting Connected and Informed. |
We should become advocates for sustainability : Poverty cannot be ‘made history’ until the threat of climate change is addressed: it will affect the poorest most and first. But all life generally is threatened by climate catastrophe. Such as :
|
Level Three – Changing Behaviour |
We should think about future generations : if you have (or expect to have) children or grandchildren, what can we do to ensure that climate catastrophe is averted? The impact on the grandchildren of our generations, all over the world, is likely to be devastating, particularly on the poorest. Such as :
|
Extracts from Mayer Hillman’s book, How We Can Save the Planet (Penguin, 2004). Climate change is the most important issue of our age…If we, collectively and individually, do not act resolutely on it and to the extent that is imperative, the prospects are grim. Higher temperatures are predicted worldwide, with the average 6 ° C above current levels by the end of the century. And higher still in some countries……This is not the view of alarmists but the considered opinion of international climate scientists….We are currently on the road to ecological Armageddon, with little apparent thought for the effects on ourselves, let alone on the populations succeeding us. …. It does not have to be like this…..There is one simple fact underlying all of this: we now know that the planet has a finite capacity to absorb greenhouse gas emissions. …. We hope you will be encouraged to join in promoting a radical reappraisal of personal and public decisions from a climate change perspective. Individuals need not only to adapt their lifestyles but, more importantly, to press for the political change that is the only way out of the impasse into which our head-burying instincts have led us. Widespread public support is vital now. Time is running out. …. Our present and future decision about the use of fossil-fuels will have a major impact on the quality of life of people in the next few decades and the generations succeeding us. We have a moral responsibility to act with this inescapable truth in mind. Future generations will justifiably sit in judgement on what we chose to do in the early part of this century in full knowledge – as accessories before the fact – of the devastating consequences of continuing with our energy-profligate lifestyles. The accumulation of evidence on climate change and its damaging impacts make progressively unacceptable that in the years ahead we attempt to plead ignorance with the excuse ‘we did not know’ – with all its haunting wartime images of the outcome of looking the other way. Explanatory and complementary notesIt is very easy to feel powerless and to avert our thoughts and minds from these issues: this Framework is an attempt to counter that powerlessness. The Framework (which, inevitably, is incomplete) is in levels so that its users can see a progression – but we should attempt to implement it with all deliberate speed. It is difficult to avoid sounding ‘preachy’ or ‘hair-shirty’, so all the suggestions above are just that – suggestions. No doubt you will have other ideas, and what you can do will differ from what others can do. For me, personally, giving up having a bath would be a real hardship, though I know I ‘should’! I also do like meat! But as for air-travel: we haven’t flown for a holiday since 1996, and we’ve had some great holidays. One particular issue, when considering ‘sustainable consumption’, is establishing for yourself the difference between ‘wants’ and ‘needs’: it’s a good idea to get into the habit of asking oneself ‘do I need that new gizmo?’ or that new piece of equipment, clothing etc etc. We are facing an extremely difficult and unpalatable situation: If climate catastrophe is to be averted, who needs to do what , by when, and what, being realistic, might motivate them? At the moment, the UK per capita emission of CO 2 is 10 tons per annum: we have, urgently, to get down to one ton per person per year in order to avert climate catastrophe. Saying that the problem lies with the US, or China, or India is one way of denying that we should do anything at all. And saying we should leave it to the next generation – well, there just isn’t time for that sort of delay. If you would like the transcript of a talk given by George Monbiot at the Environmental Law Foundation’s 2005 Annual Lecture, please let me know. He says we need to cut CO 2 emissions by 90% by 2030! http://www.monbiot.com/ One issue that needs consideration and attention is that of ‘too many climate changers’ in the world – see www.populationandsustainability.org Please feel free to adapt the Framework and notes and send to your friends/contacts/ colleagues . If it is used in a public arena (eg a website) please credit me. Otherwise, no copyright on this! It would be good if a real sustainability dialogue could develop. Catherine Budgett-Meakin: Catherine@Budgett-Meakin.co.uk, 25/05/2006 |